A Finnish family with two toddlers was forced to relocate after a burst pipe flooded their Kirkkonummi rental apartment, but Asuntosäätiö (Finland's largest non-profit housing provider) insisted the property remained habitable despite having no shower and exposed electrical wiring.
The Puhakka family's ordeal began when a water pipe in their sauna ceiling burst, flooding multiple rooms and requiring extensive renovation work. The family discovered three additional leaks in the same pipe. Water damage spread through the bathroom, sauna, entrance hall, and kitchen, with parquet flooring beginning to crack and separate.
Landlord disputes uninhabitable conditions
Asuntosäätiö offered only a 70% rent reduction for the €1,060 monthly apartment, payable only after renovation completion in mid-March. The foundation argued that "repair work causes housing inconvenience, but does not prevent living in the apartment, and thus the apartment is not completely uninhabitable."
The family described living conditions with concrete floors, holes in walls exposing electrical wires, nails protruding from door frames, and a brick wall where the shower once stood. Father Joonatan Puhakka asked pointedly: "Should we have washed the children's bottoms in a snowbank?"
Electricity costs soared from €26 to €163 monthly due to industrial drying equipment. The family now sleeps on a single mattress in a relative's basement, unable to afford two rents simultaneously.
Finnish tenant protections under scrutiny
Kati Korppoo from Finland's Competition and Consumer Authority confirmed that habitability assessments are case-specific, with bathrooms, toilets, and kitchens considered critical spaces. Nordic housing policies vary significantly, with Finland and Denmark showing higher rates of housing benefit recipients compared to Norway and Sweden.
Asuntosäätiö's policy requires tenants to pay full rent during repairs, with compensation only after work completion. Property director Rain Köiv stated the foundation cannot provide temporary housing and justified the approach as compliant with Finland's residential tenancy law.
The case exposes how Finland's rental housing system can trap families between unlivable conditions and financial ruin. Unlike Norway and Denmark's higher space standards, Finland's tenant protections appear weaker when disputes arise over habitability.
Expect this case to prompt parliamentary questions about strengthening Finland's tenant protection laws, particularly regarding immediate rent relief during major repairs.
Read more: Finnish Co-op Cuts Veggie Prices for Climate Goals.
Read more: Finnish Archbishop Gets Prison Term for Grant Fraud.
