Parents of fourth graders in Oslo could soon pay thousands more for after-school programs. The city's conservative-led government proposes ending free activities for families earning over 1.5 million kroner ($140,000).
The change would take effect in 2026 if the budget passes. Opposition Labour Party members strongly oppose the measure.
Marthe Scharning Lund, Labour's group leader, expressed deep concern. She said this affects families with quite ordinary incomes in expensive parts of the city. Many parents might withdraw children from after-school programs, she warned.
Lund stood with activity school leader Ellinor Margrethe Eide at Sagene School. This popular Oslo neighborhood has high housing costs. Free after-school programs boosted participation from 76% to over 96% for grades 1-4.
Both women called the current free program crucial for getting more children into organized activities. Eide noted Sagene School has 100% participation among fourth graders.
The city council defends the change as necessary for school funding. Education councilor Julie Remen Midtgarden said they prioritize classroom learning over universal free after-school care.
Oslo faces challenging financial circumstances, the council acknowledged. The change would save 92 million kroner ($8.6 million) annually.
Currently, free after-school care costs Oslo nearly 175 million kroner ($16.3 million) each year for fourth graders alone.
Midtgarden emphasized the income threshold ensures lower-income families still get free care. About half of fourth graders would remain eligible under the new system.
Free part-time spots continue unchanged for grades 1-3. The national government only funds these younger grades, making Oslo's program more generous than required.
At Sagene School, activities include sports, creative projects, and learning support. Staff follow what children study in class and incorporate it into afternoon activities.
Eide stressed the social importance of these programs. Children who don't participate might feel excluded from their peer group, she said.
The political debate reflects broader tensions in Norwegian municipal finances. Opposition claims the council prioritizes property tax cuts for the wealthy over children's programs.
This marks another example of municipalities making difficult choices as economic pressures mount across Norway. The outcome will show whether Oslo residents accept reduced services for budget balance.