Jomana Gad was preparing for her high school graduation when Sweden's Migration Agency delivered a deportation order that would send her to Egypt alone. Her parents and younger siblings could stay in Upplands Väsby, but at 18, she was now considered an independent adult with no automatic right to remain in the country where she had lived since age four. Source: Immigration and Emigration - Statistics Denmark.
The decision has ignited fierce debate across Swedish society and beyond about how Nordic countries handle young adults who grew up as immigrants but lack permanent residency. Sweden's approach offers a stark warning for Danish policymakers considering similar restrictions.
Policy shift splits families
Sweden eliminated "särskilt ömmande omständigheter" (particularly compassionate circumstances) provisions in late 2023, removing protections for young adults who spoke Swedish, attended school, or had deep family ties. The change came from the center-right government coalition with support from both the Sweden Democrats and Social Democrats, reflecting a broader Nordic shift toward restrictive immigration policies.
The human cost is immediate. Expressen reported that Jomana was "in shock" upon receiving her deportation notice, while TV4 documented her family's anguish at being separated despite years of integration efforts.
Similar cases are emerging across the country. Ece Akkus, 19, faces deportation to Turkey while attending gymnasium in Karlstad. Iliya, who arrived from Iran at age eight, received rejection despite his mother obtaining permanent residency. These aren't isolated bureaucratic errors but the predictable result of policy designed to reduce immigration numbers regardless of individual circumstances.
Political resistance grows
Public opinion strongly opposes the deportations. An Aftonbladet poll found 66 percent of Swedes want to restore compassionate circumstances provisions, with only 20 percent supporting current policy. Even half of Sweden Democrats voters favor allowing well-integrated young adults to remain.
The political response reveals deep fractures. Opposition parties pushed legislation to restore protections and extend family-based residency rights to age 21, but failed when Social Democrats refused support. "This is not worthy of a country like Sweden," declared Left Party migration spokesperson Tony Haddou during the parliamentary debate.
More telling is the government coalition's internal discord. The Liberal Party demands a "valve" to halt deportations, while Migration Minister Johan Forssell acknowledged working on solutions to make rules "reasonable." According to Dagens Nyheter, even Sweden Democrats leader Jimmie Åkesson supports exceptions for young people who "work, study and have adapted."
Nordic model under strain
Sweden's family separation policy exposes tensions in Nordic welfare states built on social cohesion. These societies invest heavily in education and integration, then discard young adults precisely when those investments might pay off. Jomana speaks Swedish, attends gymnasium, and has classmates publicly supporting her case yet faces deportation to a country she barely remembers.
Danish politicians should note Sweden's experience before adopting similar measures. The policy creates humanitarian crises without solving integration challenges, splits families despite years of successful settlement, and generates massive public opposition even among anti-immigration voters.
The Liberal Party's rebellion signals imminent policy reversal. With spring deportation orders already triggering street protests and media campaigns, expect Forssell to announce "temporary exceptions" by May 2024 to prevent coalition collapse before the European Parliament elections.
Read more: Denmark Raises Skilled Worker Salary Bar Despite Labor Crisi....
Read more: Sweden Launches First Major War Preparedness Drills Since 19....