The prosecution began its closing arguments Wednesday in the terror trial against Arfan Bhatti. Norwegian authorities allocated three days for final procedures from both prosecutors and defense attorneys. These sessions will summarize evidence and present final claims about the verdict judges should reach.
Prosecutors clearly indicated they will demand Bhatti's conviction according to the indictment. The central question remains what punishment he might receive.
Lead prosecutor Sturla Henriksbø stated they will summarize evidence from the main hearing that clearly shows Bhatti's role in planning and motivating Zaniar Matapour's terror attack. He emphasized sentencing and potential preventive detention will be key questions during these procedures.
Bhatti faces charges of complicity in severe terrorism following the mass shooting in Oslo city center on June 25, 2022. He has consistently denied criminal guilt throughout the proceedings.
The attack occurred when Zaniar Matapour opened fire at multiple nightlife venues in Rosenkrantz Street, including the London Pub which is particularly popular within Oslo's LGBTQ+ community. Two men were killed and several people injured in the assault. Matapour has already been convicted and sentenced to 30 years of preventive detention for severe terrorism.
Prosecutors maintain Bhatti was the central mastermind behind the attack, allegations he personally denies.
Defense attorney Bernt Heiberg from Elden Law Firm, representing Bhatti, claims the evidence remains weak. He argues that despite the lengthy court proceedings and numerous presented evidences, little concretely connects Bhatti to actions before Matapour committed the attack.
This marathon trial has unfolded in Oslo District Court's largest courtroom since September 2. Judges are scheduled to begin deliberations on November 7.
Over seven weeks, the court has heard extensive witness testimony and reviewed substantial evidence. The contrasting positions between prosecution and defense highlight the high stakes of this nationally significant case.
The trial's outcome will have substantial implications for Norway's approach to terrorism prosecutions and community safety concerns.